Archive for the 'Deep Thoughts' Category

Death in the Absence of Religion

admin October 4th, 2008

I know that I risk losing whatever readership I currently have here, as well as producing all kinds of trollish comments with this post, but what else are anonymous blogs for?

I have read several times on other blogs mothers asking in earnest what to say to their children about death if they feel uncomfortable with the usual Christian story of heaven. If you don’t truly believe that we all (or all the “good” people, however you define that) go to float amongst the clouds with our other good relatives and friends in a state of bliss, what do you say? Is it better to tell children this, just to alleviate fears?

I have never and will never agree with purposely lying to children. Children of all people are seeking to find their way, seeking for truths, figuring out the world they live in. They are also much smarter than many give them credit for. If any question deserves a careful and truthful answer, this is it.

I can’t presume to know your family, your beliefs, or your child. So let me just put down here what I hope to be able to impart to my child when that day comes.

Death is when living things stop living. They do not come back. Death can be sad because we miss those who die, but the dead feel no pain. It is those left behind who feel pain after death. We must all die, but people usually live a nice long time. Death is not always a bad thing. It reminds us that life is precious and should not be wasted. It allows for new people, plants and animals to have a turn at living. Leaves fall from the trees in winter so that new leaves grow in the spring. These new leaves make the tree stronger. So it goes with people as well. We die to allow space to the living. We should not fear death so much as celebrate life. A life spent fearing death is wasted.

Whatever we do in the world is the way we imprint our lives; it is our immortality. Our children, our deeds good and bad, those we influence, that is how we continue.

On heaven, you are free to come to your own conclusion, but know that I do not think that heaven is a truth. I think that it is a pretty idea that can make people feel better, but a false idea. There are too many problems with heaven. Some people believe that animals cannot get into heaven because they are different from people. Some people believe that if you don’t believe certain things, you don’t get to go to heaven either. No place could be pleasant for me without animals, and without my friends and family, whatever their beliefs. So I cannot conceive of such a heaven. A heaven where animals and those with different beliefs are allowed likewise would not be suitable for other people. There can be no perfect paradise for all.

We must therefore strive to make our lives and those of others as much of a paradise as possible. Life is such an incredible gift. We must make treasure our lives. We must help others to treasure theirs.

We are born into different circumstances. Because we have been given so many things, it is our responsibility to help those who were not so lucky. That is the burden of the gifted. We do this not because we are trying to buy our way into paradise; we do this because it is the only way to make this life as good as it can be for us and those around us. We do this because death is the end for us, but others keep on living. We do this in memory of those we loved, so that their good deeds are not wasted.

Death is sad, but only because life is so wonderful. Death is the payment you make for life. I think that it’s a good deal.

Science Debate

admin October 2nd, 2008

I know I’m not supposed to post twice in a day, but it feels wrong to have up a political post without a mention of the science debate. If you care anything at all about science, the way things work, politics, energy, or the world in general, you should read over this website.

http://www.sciencedebate2008.com/www/index.php?id=42

On Palin

admin October 2nd, 2008

I’d feel sorry for her, if I wasn’t so completely opposed to pretty much everything she supports politically. I just don’t get how she can think the way she does, but then people have a right to form ideas as they choose. I’m also a bit worried about the Intelligence Quotient banging around in there. Why doesn’t she just admit that they has no foreign relations experience, that it is McCain with that experience and that was not why she was chosen? Why can’t she just make up some news source when asked what she was reading? Seriously, has she never heard of Fox News, CNN, Time Magazine, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, NPR….?

I actually find it offensive that McCain chose such a weak female candidate. I can only hope it is because he had such a hard time finding a woman who so strongly supported limitation of women’s rights and destroying our natural environment. Wouldn’t it be nice to have a female VP with kids,who was at least mostly qualified and able to hold her own when asked questions without prepared answers? The fact that she was the one chosen makes it appear as though she is the best to be had. Humph.

Anyway, this LA times article pretty much sums up my ideas.

“This isn’t the first time a boss has picked an unqualified woman just because she agrees with him and opposes everything most other women want and need. Feminism has never been about getting a job for one woman. It’s about making life more fair for women everywhere. It’s not about a piece of the existing pie; there are too many of us for that. It’s about baking a new pie. Selecting Sarah Palin, who was touted all summer by Rush Limbaugh, is no way to attract most women, including die-hard Clinton supporters. Palin shares nothing but a chromosome with Clinton.”

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-steinem4-2008sep04,0,7541303.story

I have a friend who chided me that the focus on Palin’s inexperience is hypocritical when supporting a Presidential candidate with so little. True, Obama is a young candidate and lack of experience is a sticking point. I think he has plenty for the office, but that’s another discussion. The fact is that no one is perfectly prepared for the Presidency. People with lots of experience are chided as “Career Politicians.” The thing is that when presented with obstacles that he has not yet faced, he has the mental acuity to find a satisfactory answer. He has thought about the issues. He knows what the President does and he has been in Washington. I agree that #1 should be more important than #2, but when Palin provides such great material to Tina Fey, how can McCain compete?

I’ll be watching the debate during comedy hour with a bowl of popcorn since I’m sure that Palin will generate her share of laughs. Poor woman.