Archive for January, 2009

My Kid is a Retard

admin January 30th, 2009

Well, not really. Or at least I don’t think so. But sometimes …

Let me explain. Way back before a sperm fertilized an egg in my uterus , I heard about how competitive moms can be, how they are always comparing every tiny milestone, how annoying it is, and how mostly these things have no correlation to later performance. How petty, no? So, I thought to myself, well, I won’t be like that. I won’t go around comparing my kid to anyone else’s. Those moms are nuts. I am totally better than that. And I am, I mean, was.

What I didn’t realize at the time was that I had meant that I wouldn’t go around making other parents feel bad when their kid wasn’t as smart and talented as mine. I mean, I have some pretty good genetic material floating around in here. It’s not the other kids’ fault that their parents didn’t set them up as well. Not everyone can be above average.

What I didn’t consider, not for a second, was that I might be the one whose kid seemed a little slow. He’s six and a half months, and I think, probably doing just fine. But it is hard to go to playgroup and see the 7 month old who has been crawling for 3 months, and the 7.5 month old pulling up when we’re still working on unassisted sitting. Even the kid who refused to grab at things for like 5 months now seems to be on track to surpass my son. Also, he babbles, but I’ve yet to hear anything that sounds remotely like “mamma.” How did this happen?

I have interject here that playgroup may be a skewed sample set. Yes, I have a PhD, but let’s see, two moms’ husbands are currently working on their doctorate, one is a lawyer, one works for a prestigious management consulting firm, etc. etc. So, if it were just playgroup, well then I could console myself with the fact that we’re hanging out with little geniuses. But it’s not just playgroup. Even the dumb relative’s kids are outpacing him. That’s right. Dweedle and Deedle’s son is totally crawling, and cousin Cletis is mamamama-ing up a storm. Urrghhg!

Aside from the fact that I have been completely blindsided not only by my son’s slower development, but also how much it is affecting me, others feel the need to speculate on how these events might be connected to my mothering decisions. Maybe I should have given him formula. Maybe I should have had him start foods sooner. Maybe if we hadn’t swaddled him so long.. Maybe if we let him watch some TV…maybe maybe maybe.

So I am trying just to make sure that he is in the normal RANGE and am waiting until his perfect SAT scores, or his winning orchestral compositions, or his Pulitzer-prize winning novel produce that luxuriously fulfilling feeling of vindication. Until then, well honey, I’ll still love you, even if you are retarded.

Some things you may not know about cancer

admin January 15th, 2009

Disclaimer: This information is intended for general information purposes only and is not intended to replace that provided by a medical professional. For information, visit the American Cancer Society at www.cancer.org or the national cancer institute at www.cancer.gov.

According to the American Cancer Society statistics on cancer death in the U.S. from 1999-2001, one in every three women, and one in every two men will develop cancer in their lifetime. Statistically, if a man in the US manages to avoid all other preventable causes of death, he will die of prostate cancer.

You may think of cancer, as I once did, as a disease that either you have or you don’t. Like a parasitic bacterium unknowingly picked up from a door knob, I thought, one day you are cancer free, and the next, though you might not know it yet, it’s there. And just as one salmonella bacterium will look and act the same as most every other salmonella bacterium, it makes sense that one man’s cancer should look just like another man’s disease. It turns out that cancer (at least as we currently understand it) is not like that at all.

Cancer is not a single disease, but a term used to describe a collection of over 100 related diseases. What these share in common is rogue cells. As described by the National Cancer Institute, “The body is made up of many types of cells. These cells grow and divide in a controlled way to produce more cells as they are needed to keep the body healthy. When cells become old or damaged, they die and are replaced with new cells.” And so it goes, over and over, until something goes wrong. A cell’s DNA is changed so that it no longer follows the rules, and it starts growing too quickly, or dividing much faster than it should, or not dying when it should, or sometimes, wandering off to grow someplace where it doesn’t belong.

Normally, this doesn’t happen in one shot. Due to the body’s incredible system of safeguards, small DNA mutations can be kept in check. For example, if a cell’s DNA is changed such that the genes that regulate growth are damaged and it grows too fast, other genes produce signals to slow growth, kill the cell, or repair the damage. Therefore, it requires a succession of events to give rise to cancer. Not only must cells’ genes that regulate growth and division be changed, but the genes that normally protect and repair the cells, or kill the unhealthy ones, must be damaged as well. Colon cancer, for example, is a prototype for cancer progression. As many as six to eight specific mutations are necessary to give rise to a fully invasive growth. This is why the terms “precancerous” and “benign” tumor are used. A benign tumor is not cancerous, and cells from these tumors are rarely a threat to life, but such “precancerous” tissue can indicate that the path to cancer has begun. There is not a clear line of demarcation between benign and cancerous cells or tissue. If these cells are not removed, additional genetic mutations could give rise to malignant, or cancerous, tissue. Cancer, then, is a multi-step process.

So then, how do these mutations occur? Anything that can change or damage cell DNA can produce cancer. Inherited genetic mutations are probably the most commonly known, though these are a minority compared to those that are caused by environmental factors. Other causes include damaging radiation, viruses, cellular trauma, tumor promoting chemicals, and some metals. Even if these don’t get you, statistics will. Every time a cell divides, there is a chance that it will make a mistake. This is the reason that age is the single greatest risk factor for cancer. For every additional year of our lives, the chance that these mistakes will occur increases exponentially.

To further complicate the issue, not all the cells in a cancerous tumor necessarily have the same mutations. Say for example that the genes that code for cell damage prevention are mutated in a lung cell. This cell then goes on to produce more cells with the same mutation. Then, one of these cells develops another mutation such that a controlling checkpoint no longer works, and unhealthy cells do not die. Again, these mutations are repeated over and over as the cell replicates itself. Finally, a virus comes along and inserts some DNA into one of these cells that tells it to divide many more times than normal, while another cell is damaged by a chemical such that it grows too fast. These cells are then uniformly identified as “lung cancer”, but their DNA and behavior are not the same. Similarly, cancerous cells that originate in the lungs possess different biochemistry and genes than those that originate, for instance, in the liver.

All of these factors combine to produce a disease that is very difficult to eliminate. Chemotherapy drugs that kill one type of cancer cell may not be effective on another. Additionally, the same drugs that initially treat one diagnosed form of cancer may actually promote another later on. It is not uncommon that a chemotherapy agent is also a known carcinogen.

But it is not all bad news. There are things we can do to protect ourselves, such as limiting exposure to carcinogens, eating foods that combat harmful chemicals, and aiding our doctors in early detection. Also, supported by billions of dollars in funds, cancer researchers are making huge breakthroughs in understanding and treatment. Chemotherapy cocktails have had success where single therapies had little effect. Researchers are hoping that soon personal and localized treatments will work more effectively and improve patient quality of life. Early reports indicate that these efforts are working.

Cancer, while common, is complex and often misunderstood. I hope that this little bit of information has helped to clarify some of the more common misconceptions regarding this disease

The Health of Our Civilization

admin January 11th, 2009

The below paragraph is an excerpt from a paper I wrote several years ago (therefore the older statistics), but after digging it up and re-reading it, I find it still quite relevant. Around election time, opponents of the Obama administration frequently spoke to me of their fear that his policies would set an uncomfortable precedent towards socialism. In every great civilization, one of the key indicators of internal weakness cited by historians is a large gulf between the wealthy and the poor. Though I don’t have the most recent statistics, I do not think that these numbers have changed much since the study dates.

“In the meritocracy of the US, we value not necessarily social equality, but social mobility. Although not everyone can be president, anyone can, or so the thinking goes. In actuality, both social equality and social mobility are declining in the US. The past several presidents have been the progeny of elite families and Ivy League schools. Economist Magazine cites the Economic Policy Institute’s figures that while between the years 1979 and 2000, the income of households in the lowest fifth of earners increased by 6.4%, that of households in the top fifth grew by70%, with those in the top 1% growing by an astounding 184%. A later study found that from 1979-1998 70% of bottom tier sons moved up the ladder more often than their fathers had. As reasons for these statistics, many point to our stratified and struggling education system. Public school funds are often tied to property taxes, hitting those in lower income areas the most, and government funds once aimed at these students are now getting converted into loans. Even affirmative action dollars are now decreasingly reasonable proxies for social disadvantage.”

Just poking my head out

admin January 8th, 2009

To say to all of you who read this, and all of you who will read this.

IT DOES GET BETTER!

Dude. This Mom gig is so much fun. I “almost” think that I could do this full time. Just wish the pay was better.